<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple Safari, Google Chrome, call it bizarre</title>
	<link>http://aruld.info/apple-safari-google-chrome-call-it-bizarre/</link>
	<description>Life, Technology and More</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 00:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Arul</title>
		<link>http://aruld.info/apple-safari-google-chrome-call-it-bizarre/#comment-3852</link>
		<author>Arul</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aruld.info/apple-safari-google-chrome-call-it-bizarre/#comment-3852</guid>
		<description>Nice. I am not a big fan of Safari though. 
May be its Windows port is not robust like OS X.

-Arul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. I am not a big fan of Safari though.<br />
May be its Windows port is not robust like OS X.</p>
<p>-Arul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mario Fernandez</title>
		<link>http://aruld.info/apple-safari-google-chrome-call-it-bizarre/#comment-3851</link>
		<author>Mario Fernandez</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 03:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aruld.info/apple-safari-google-chrome-call-it-bizarre/#comment-3851</guid>
		<description>I say that Google Chrome is excellent for speed, performance, and security. I was very impressed with Google Chrome and enjoy using it, however I just had to switch to Apple Safari. Both are based on Webkit and I believe that Webkit is the best rendering engine for any web browser. Apple does have it’s reputation for the iPhone being still the most popular and unmatched mobile device. Apple Safari, even though Firefox took control, has been gaining more market share then ever and Google Chrome as well.
My point is, Apple Safari should be the king of all web browsers when it comes to ease of use, performance, and speed. Google Chrome definitely takes over speed, however when it comes to their UI and structure of their web browser, Safari takes the lead.
You may read my blog post here about my opinion with Google Chrome and Apple Safari: http://www.boricuaspacepr.net/profiles/blogs/google-chrome-might-actually</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say that Google Chrome is excellent for speed, performance, and security. I was very impressed with Google Chrome and enjoy using it, however I just had to switch to Apple Safari. Both are based on Webkit and I believe that Webkit is the best rendering engine for any web browser. Apple does have it’s reputation for the iPhone being still the most popular and unmatched mobile device. Apple Safari, even though Firefox took control, has been gaining more market share then ever and Google Chrome as well.<br />
My point is, Apple Safari should be the king of all web browsers when it comes to ease of use, performance, and speed. Google Chrome definitely takes over speed, however when it comes to their UI and structure of their web browser, Safari takes the lead.<br />
You may read my blog post here about my opinion with Google Chrome and Apple Safari: <a href="http://www.boricuaspacepr.net/profiles/blogs/google-chrome-might-actually" rel="nofollow">http://www.boricuaspacepr.net/profiles/blogs/google-chrome-might-actually</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Chrome chemistry works better with public release Blogging at the speed of thought: Life, Technology and More</title>
		<link>http://aruld.info/apple-safari-google-chrome-call-it-bizarre/#comment-3843</link>
		<author>&#187; Chrome chemistry works better with public release Blogging at the speed of thought: Life, Technology and More</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 19:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://aruld.info/apple-safari-google-chrome-call-it-bizarre/#comment-3843</guid>
		<description>[...] to the sources. This release has at least fixed two of my sought after issues, one outlined here and other is the ability to render XML directly within the browser. It used to render XML as text [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to the sources. This release has at least fixed two of my sought after issues, one outlined here and other is the ability to render XML directly within the browser. It used to render XML as text [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
